Tag Archives: moving

“Binghamton’s four noble truths, the way I lived them” – scathing notes on my hometown

“Binghamton’s four noble truths, the way I lived them” – scathing notes on my hometown

This article is making the rounds on my newsfeed right now, and since it pertains to my new theme of “personal geography,” I thought I’d share it with y’all.

I grew up in Johnson City, New York, a suburb of Binghamton; the city was an industrial-era powerhouse, like much of the rest of upstate and the Rust Belt. We all know how this story ends, of course – in something sadly resembling a ghost town, a skeleton of its former glory, filled with forgotten factories and disadvantaged people who fell through the cracks with the rest of the ship as it sank. The area’s main saving grace at the moment is what some might call SUNY’s flagship school, Binghamton University. My parents are both alums, along with dozens of people I grew up with.

The author of this article takes the town to task here, and a number of my Facebook friends (BU alums or people otherwise tied to the area) angrily reposted it. While there’s a lot of small-minded misses in what she wrote here, there’s also at least one hit. The core of it is her description of the city’s downtown area as the bastard offspring of a zombie movie set and a college kid’s wet bar crawling dream; she also complains of how there’s little to find to do aside from that. From the perspective of an undergrad, especially one with no local family or residential ties, this is accurate. There’s a minute arts community that’s mostly home to older people who decided to retire to the crazily low housing costs of upstate – oh, and a music scene that’s just as full of nothing but straight-edge hardcore bands as it was seven years ago.

Guy keyboarding

This is State Street (i.e., bar central) in Binghamton – I never saw anything this interesting when I lived there.

On the other hand, the Binghamton area was a great place to grow up and it’s a perfect fit for my parents’ lifestyles. It’s naturally gorgeous, full of wide open spaces where you can disappear into the woods and not hear or see a car (or another human being) for as long as you like. The land costs pennies, so most houses provide tons of room for pools, gardens, tree houses, and childhood exploration. If you want to grow your own produce and rear chickens, or engage in any number of other difficult-if-not-impossible-to-do-in-a-city hobbies, this is the place for you. Mix that in with a laughably low cost of living, the ability to get across town in a matter of minutes, and some of the most kickass regional food in the Northeast, and you start to see it as less of a “shithole.”

Of course, these things aren’t going to mean shit to your average 20-something. Admittedly, I didn’t go to BU, but I grew up around it and in its sphere of influence (and I was in college once myself, not so very long ago). So, though she blames the Bingaling for her [self-perceived] weight/drinking problem and passes off some of the friendliest townspeople in the United States as an unruly horde of deformed hicks, the woman who wrote this has provided a decent summary of why I’m 3,000 miles away now – and that includes the desire to distance myself from people like her.

Love/hate? For sure. But I may well go back there when I’m ready to settle someday, and I’m sure as fuck not going to be drinking at Tom and Marty’s.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

portland, oregon: america’s unhappiest city.

hey, i didn’t say it, business week did.

apparently, the “depression rate” is calculated based on antidepressant sales. i can’t say i’m shocked that people are scarfing down the happy pills here. between the weather, the drowning-in-the-toilet economy, and the amount of douchebags from the east coast, there’s not a lot to discourage a person from making a final visit to one of the many tempting bridges in town.

those are my three key complaints, anyway – especially the weather. now, feel free to tell me i should’ve known what i was getting into on that front. no one who knows anything about and/or has spent any time in the pacific northwest is gonna try to get you to believe it’s dry up here. but i looked at all the climate graphs and related wiki articles and all that shit before we moved, and everything i saw indicated that the average total yearly precipitation of portland is comparable to the eastern cities i’ve lived in. this was (and continues to be) true. but the difference that gets swept under the rug – contributing in no small part, i imagine, to people getting duped into moving here – is how often it rains.

in the east and other temperate, forested parts of the country, the rain is sudden and powerful and it doesn’t stick around long. the significant snowfall accumulations contribute to total precipitation amounts as well, and i think even us native upstate new yorkers can agree that even in the moldering dead of our mega-winters, it doesn’t snow every day all day for weeks at a time. instead, we get one or two big blizzards that last for a day and dick up the roads for a few days after. in portland, from what i’ve observed, it rains five or six (or seven) days a week. every week. it doesn’t last all day, and it’s not a torrential downpour, but it’s enough to significantly dampen just about everything you do, especially if you’re unlucky enough to not have a car.

i really cannot over-exaggerate this. i started keeping a count of sunny days. as those are effectively mythical during this time of year, i expanded my count to include the dry-but-overcast days. there were five completely dry days between mid-january, february, march, and the first week of april. as a person who is dependent on biking and walking for transportation, believe me, i kept a careful count.

if you yourself happen to give a fuck about the ability to simultaneously be dry and outdoors, and you think portland’s weather sounds appealing compared to a snowy winter, allow me to direct you to the straight talk express. don’t be taken in by the bullshit average highs you see on weather.com. the only reason why the graph doesn’t say it’s 45-55 year-round except in the two-month-long summer is because every three weeks or so, there’s a day or two of freakish, unseasonably warm weather. below, we have a chart of april’s observed daily temperatures:

Image

OF COURSE the declared average high temperature for april is going to be skewed and completely not indicative of reality when it’s in the mid-50s every day except for that one record-high-breaking weekend. it’s like the slacker who bombs every test in class except for the one or two he bothers to study for, and those stray As salvage his grade.

i guess for some portlanders, these sunny oases do the same; the tiny spatters of nice weather keep them from plunging headlong into the willamette. as i promised yesterday, i’m not about to shit on everything, and even i can admit that when it’s warm here, it’s stunning: minimally humid and pleasantly breezy, with plenty of shade around to boot. but is one weekend a month enough to get by on until the fabled first-week-of-july onset of portland’s brief summer? not for me. i’d rather shovel snow until april fool’s day than slog through nine and a half months of guaranteed constant rain.

well, i’d really rather do neither. so, i’ll see you in three months to the day, austin.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.